Arthur Nagel vs Tadija Radovanovic Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 29 Oct at 04:16 AM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
A. Nagel vs T. Radovanovic

FRA
1
Win
Played
0
Win

SRB
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Nagel 1 - 0 Radovanovic
They have played 2 sets in total, with Arthur Nagel winning 2 and Tadija Radovanovic winning 0. The last match between Arthur Nagel and Tadija Radovanovic was at the M15 Malta, 29-10-2025, Round: R1, Surface: Hard, with Arthur Nagel getting the victory 6-4 6-3.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Nagel | 1 |
| Radovanovic | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(R1) M15 Malta(10-29-25)
A. Nagel vs T. Radovanovic H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 63.16% (96-56) | Career Total W/L | 43.97% (62-79) |
| 1 | Hard | 0 |
| 1 | Titles | 0 |
| 1 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
A. Nagel vs T. Radovanovic Match Preview:
- Who has the edge in the second serve performance? Tadija Radovanovic slightly edges out Arthur Nagel, winning 46.99% of points compared to Nagel’s 44.17% over the past six months.
- Analyzing return game stats, Radovanovic is stronger, winning 51.35% of opponents' second serve points and 28.90% against first serves, whereas Nagel wins 42.04% and 26.55% respectively.
- Under pressure, Radovanovic demonstrates resilience, saving 60.00% of breakpoints; Nagel saves 49.62%.
- In terms of overall performance, Nagel has won 62.90% of matches over the past year, slightly higher than Radovanovic’s 60.87%.
- Both players show their best performances on clay courts, with Nagel and Radovanovic each achieving a 66% win rate.
- When considering player level, Nagel has more matches under his belt with a 63.33% win rate, compared to Radovanovic’s 60.87%.
- Looking at the quality of opponents, Radovanovic faces tougher competition, averaging against players ranked 58.09, compared to Nagel’s 434.6.
- If the match extends to a deciding set, Radovanovic shows greater composure, winning 78% as opposed to Nagel’s 58%.
Editorial Prediction (October 29, 2025, UTC):
As these two players prepare for their upcoming match, their recent form suggests different strengths that could influence the outcome. Tadija Radovanovic presents a slight advantage in both second serve performance and return game stats, crucial elements in the game of tennis.
Radovanovic also appears to handle pressure better, efficiently saving a larger percentage of breakpoints compared to Arthur Nagel. Moreover, his performance against significantly higher-ranked opponents suggests an ability to compete at a higher level.
While Nagel has a marginally better match win rate over the past year, the higher quality of Radovanovic’s opponents, combined with his superior performance in deciding sets, provides him an edge.
Considering these factors, Tadija Radovanovic is the most likely winner for this upcoming match.
Arthur Nagel vs Tadija Radovanovic Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
A. Nagel vs T. Radovanovic H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 12 | Games Won | 7 |
| 3 | Aces (Total) | 5 |
| 2 | Total Double Faults | 1 |
| 0:56:42 | Average Match Time | 0:56:42 |
| 66% (35/53) | 1st Serve % | 56% (18/32) |
| 60% (21/35) | 1st Serve Win % | 83% (15/18) |
| 56% (10/18) | 2nd Serve Win % | 57% (8/14) |
| 50% (1/2) | Break Pts Won % | 20% (1/5) |
| 28% (9/32) | Return Points Win % | 42% (22/53) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
A. Nagel Recent Matches Played
T. Radovanovic Recent Matches Played

A. Nagel vs T. Radovanovic Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 63.16% (96/56) | YTD Win/Loss | 43.97% (62/79) |
| 59.94% (208/139) | Sets Win/Loss | 44.92% (146/179) |
| 54.50% (1769/1477) | Games Win/Loss | 48.52% (1610/1708) |
| 80.00% (8/2) | Hard Win/Loss | 43.33% (13/17) |
| 65.82% (52/27) | Clay Win/Loss | 44.76% (47/58) |
| 57.14% (36/27) | Indoor Hard W/L | 33.33% (2/4) |
| 0.28 | Aces Per Game | 0.11 |
| 435 | Aces Total | 178 |
| 0.2 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.06 |
| 311 | Total Double Faults | 100 |
| 1:19:25 | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 347.61 | Average Opponent Rank | 160.52 |
| 65% (5537/8525) | 1st Serve % | 65% (1595/2441) |
| 67% (3692/5537) | 1st Serve Win % | 68% (1084/1595) |
| 50% (1506/2988) | 2nd Serve Win % | 43% (364/846) |
| 43% (367/845) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 35% (83/236) |
| 40% (3324/8261) | Return Points Win % | 38% (919/2426) |
| 50.00% (1/1) | Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 63.33% (95/55) | Futures W/L | 43.97% (62/79) |
| 63% (94/150) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 44% (61/140) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 49% (17/35) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 39% (13/33) |
| 59% (26/44) | Deciding Set Win % | 48% (21/44) |
| 88% (95/84) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 79% (63/50) |
| 12% (95/11) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 21% (63/13) |
| 20% (56/11) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 15% (78/12) |